System for measuring the true dimensions and orientation of objects in a two dimensional image

ABSTRACT

The invention is a system for measuring the true dimensions and orientation of objects in a two dimensional image. The system is comprised of a ruler comprising at least one set of features each comprised of two or more markers that are identifiable in the image and having a known spatial relationship between them and a software package comprising programs that allow extension of the ruler and other objects in the two dimensional image beyond their physical dimensions or shape. The system can be used together with radiographic imagery means, processing means, and display means to take x-ray images and to measure the true dimensions and orientation of objects and to aid in the identification and location of a surgery tool vs. anatomy in those x-ray images. The invention provides a method of drawing and displaying on a two dimensional x-ray image measurements of objects visible in said image, graphical information, or templates of surgical devices.

PRIORITY CLAIMS

This Application is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent applicationSer. No. 16/662,059, titled “A System For Measuring The True DimensionsAnd Orientation Of Objects In A Two Dimensional Image”, filed by theinventors of the present Application on Oct. 24, 2019;

which in turn, is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent application Ser.No. 15/256,642, titled “A System For Measuring The True Dimensions AndOrientation Of Objects In A Two Dimensional Image”, filed by theinventors of the present Application on Sep. 5, 2016;

which, in turn, is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent applicationSer. No. 14/106,771, titled “A System For Measuring The True DimensionsAnd Orientation Of Objects In A Two Dimensional Image”, filed by theinventors of the present Application on Dec. 15, 2013;

which, in turn, is a continuation of U.S. Utility patent applicationSer. No. 12/665,731, titled “System For Measuring The True DimensionsAnd Orientation Of Objects In A Two Dimensional Image”, filed by theinventors of the present Application on Jun. 1, 2010;

which, in turn, is a national phase entry of PCT Application No.PCT/IL08/00841 titled “A System For Measuring The True Dimensions AndOrientation Of Objects In A Two Dimensional Image”, filed by theinventors of the present Application on Jun. 19, 2008;

which, in turn, claims priority from Israeli Application 184151 filed bythe inventors of the present Application on Jun. 21, 2007.

Based on the above listed priority chain, priority is hereby claimedfrom all of the above listed Applications, all of which are herebyincorporated by reference into the present Application.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention is related to the field of medical radiography. Morespecifically the invention relates to devices and methods of accuratelymeasuring the dimensions in a specific orientation of objects observablein two-dimensional images, e.g. radiographic images.

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains materialwhich is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has noobjection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent documentor the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and TrademarkOffice patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrightwhatsoever.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The technical problem that is addressed by the present invention hasbeen known since the earliest application of x-rays as an aid in medicaldiagnostics and the performance of medical procedures. The problem iseasily understood with reference to FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B. X-ray source 10is roughly a point source that emits a cone of x-rays that project animage 40 of radiopaque object 20 on surface 30. Surface 30 is in somecases essentially planar but is usually distorted as a result of theconfiguration of the equipment used to make the images. The surface 30can be of any type made sensitive to x-rays, e.g. a sheet of glass orplastic or a thin paper or plastic film coated with a material thatfluoresces when struck by x-rays or coated with a photographic emulsionor an electronic device whose surface has an array of pixels such as aCCD device. As can be seen in the Figures, the scale of image 40 onsurface 30 depends on the distance of identical objects 20 from thesource 10 (FIG. 1A) and/or on the angle of the object with reference toplanar surface 30 (FIG. 1B). As a result, the surgeon cannot accuratelymeasure distances or the size, shape, and orientation of objects inx-ray images and has to rely on intuition and experience to determinethese parameters. The problem is especially serious in the case ofsurgical procedures that must be carried out using frequent x-rayimagery. In this case accurate work is limited by the ability of thesurgeon to know exact values of the above mentioned parameters. In theabsence of this information, time consuming trial and error is needed tocomplete the procedure and the lack of accurate measurements has beendetermined to be one of the causes of failures of orthopedic procedures.

As mentioned above, this problem was recognized very early in thedevelopment of the field of medical radiography. In January 1897, only alittle over one year after the ground breaking paper by Roentgen thatgave the first scientific explanation of the phenomenon that he calledx-rays, a patent application that eventually became U.S. Pat. No.581,540 was filed in the U.S. Patent Office. The invention comprises agrid of radiopaque wires placed between the object being x-rayed (insidea human body) and the planar surface on which the images are recordedand an “angle plate” which is applied to the body to insure parallelismof the x-rays. The object of the invention being to provide “an improvedradiographic apparatus whereby the exact location of an invisibleobject, not permeable or difficulty permeable by the so-called“Roentgen” or “X” rays, may be accurately ascertained and measurementsmade by which operations necessary for the removal of such objects arecontrolled and guided”.

In the intervening years since the publication of U.S. Pat. No. 581,540and the present, numerous patents have been granted and scientificarticles published that provide different solutions to different aspectsof the same problem. A brief review of some of these solutions can befound by reviewing the following patents:

-   -   U.S. Pat. No. 1,396,920 describes an indicator comprising        radiopaque marks on a plane parallel to the object to be        observed and the x-ray sensitive plate. In this way the        indicator appears on the x-ray image and the known distances        between the marks can be used to determine the correct scale of        the distances that appear in the image and thus the size of the        object can be accurately determined.    -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,970,119 describes a scaling device comprising an        easily observable radiopaque member having radiolucent gaps        spaced a known distance apart. The embodiments of the scaling        device can be use externally or incorporated into a catheter to        allow the device to be manipulated into a position in the        vicinity of the anatomical structure to be measured as close as        possible to the plane of the structure while being oriented as        closely as possible to perpendicular to the x-ray beam.    -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,052,035 describes a device comprised of a        transparent substrate on which is created a grid of parallel        radiopaque lines. The film is placed over the area of the body        of the patient of interest and an x-ray image is taken. The grid        appears in the x-ray image as an overlay on the anatomical        structure. The transparent substrate is adapted so that, by use        of a marking instrument, marks can be applied to the body. In        this way features that appear in the x-ray image can be        accurately located on/in the body of the patient.    -   U.S. Pat. No. 3,706,883 describes an elongated probe (catheter)        that includes at least one radiopaque segment of known length.        The probe is introduced into the body and is brought into        proximity to the object to be measured. The radiopaque portion        of the probe appears on the x-ray image next to the object whose        size is unknown. The ratio of the apparent length of the        radiopaque portion of the probe to its known length provides the        scale factor necessary to determine the length of the other        objects that appear in the x-ray image.    -   U.S. Pat. No. 4,005,527 describes a depth gauge comprised of        alternating sections of radiopaque and radiolucent material of        known length. The depth gauge can be inserted into a hole or        cavity to be observed using x-ray methods. The gauge will be        seen on the x-ray image and can be used to provide a scale to        measure the depth of the hole and dimensions of other features        seen in the image. In one embodiment, the depth gauge is the        shaft of a drill and serves to enable the surgeon to know the        depth of the hole that he has drilled into a bone.

This brief survey of the prior art gives an indication of a fact of lifethat is well known to surgeons, i.e. that the solution to the problemsfirst recognized in the earliest days of medical radiography has not yetbeen found. Each of the solutions proposed to date, while it mightrepresent an improvement over prior proposals or may give adequateresults for certain procedures, has not provided an overall solution.

A surgeon using any of the previous measurement techniques, whetherinvolving using a regular ruler to measure objects directly (not throughx-ray) or measuring objects on the image itself will experience the samelimitations. Measuring objects directly is often problematic sinceaccess is limited to the objects measured and measuring on the imageitself, besides requiring a calibration, can only provide measurementson the projection of the object and in the projection plane.

While x-ray images are two dimensional and prior art techniques allowreasonably accurate two dimensional measurements in the plane of theimage itself, the surgeon would ideally like to have the ability to makethree dimensional measurements and measure the objects at any directionhe desires. In particular orthopedic surgeons would like to be able toaccurately measure objects not in the image plane and to measureobjects, without penetrating them, while retaining the measurementaccuracy.

It is therefore a purpose of the present invention to provide a rulerwhich improves upon and overcomes the limitations of prior art rulersused for measuring distances in radiographic images.

It is another purpose of the present invention to provide a ruler whichallows a surgeon to make three dimensional measurements and measureobjects in a radiographic image at any direction he desires.

It is another purpose of the present invention to provide a ruler whichallows a surgeon to accurately measure objects not in the image plane,while retaining the measurement accuracy.

It is another purpose of the present invention to provide a ruler whichallows a surgeon to accurately measure objects without penetrating them,while retaining the measurement accuracy.

Further purposes and advantages of this invention will appear as thedescription proceeds.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect, the invention is a system for measuring the truedimensions and orientation of objects in a two dimensional image. Thesystem is comprised of a ruler comprising at least one set of featureseach comprised of two or more markers that are identifiable in the imageand having a known spatial relationship between them and a softwarepackage comprising programs that allow extension of the ruler and otherobjects in the two dimensional image beyond their physical dimensions orshape.

In embodiments of the invention the markers in each set are arranged inone or more rows having a known spatial relationship between them. Ifthere is more than one of the sets, at least some of the sets arealigned in a direction non-parallel to the measurement direction or toeach other.

Embodiments of the system are adapted to measuring x-ray images.Embodiments of the system are adapted to enable it to be used formeasuring the true dimensions and orientation of objects and for aidingin the identification and location of a surgery tool vs. anatomy in aradiographic image.

In a second aspect, the invention is an apparatus adapted to enable itto take x-ray images and to measure the true dimensions and orientationof objects and to aid in the identification and location of a surgerytool vs. anatomy in those x-ray images. The apparatus comprises:

-   -   a. a system comprising one or more rulers and a software package        according to the first aspect of the invention;    -   b. radiographic imagery means;    -   c. processing means; and    -   d. display means

characterized in that the software package comprises programs that allowthe processing means to recognize the features of the ruler on theradiographic image and to use the features to create a virtual extensionof the at least one ruler and to draw the virtual extension of the atleast one ruler on the radiographic image as an overlay, therebyenabling the user who is pointing the at least one ruler and looking atthe radiographic image to accurately measure objects that appear in theradiographic image.

In embodiments of the invention the software package comprises a programthat allows the zero scale on the virtual extension of the ruler to bedragged and moved around at will. In other embodiments, if a threedimensional ruler is used to determine a measuring plane and a featureknown to be on the measuring plane, then the software package comprisesa program that allows the processing means to measure the angle betweentwo lines projected on the measuring plane.

In embodiments of the invention the software package comprises a programthat allows the processing and display means to provide real timevisualization by using either a one or a three dimensional ruler inorder to draw how at least how a part of the result of the operationwill look given the positioning of the ruler or some other surgical toolvisible in the image.

In embodiments of the invention the software package comprises a programthat allows the processing and display means to find markers in theimage and place templates of implants or other objects on the image.

In embodiments of the invention the software package comprises a programthat allows the processing means to automatically determine the locationof a surgical tool in the image and to apply an image enhancementalgorithm that automatically concentrates on the specific area ofinterest to the surgeon.

In embodiments of the invention the software package comprises a programthat allows the processing and display means to synchronize AP and axialimages.

In a third aspect the invention is a ruler for use in the system of thefirst and second aspects. The ruler has at least one set of featureseach comprised of two or more markers that are identifiable in the imagehaving a known spatial relationship between them. In embodiments of theinvention the markers in each set are arranged in one or more rowshaving a known spatial relationship between them and, if there is morethan one of the sets, at least some of the sets are aligned in adirection non-parallel to the measurement direction or to each other.

The ruler can be a hand-held ruler used to “point and “measure”. Theruler may comprise means for slideably attaching it to a tool. The rulermay be an integral part of a tool, made by making at least part of thetool from a translucent material and embedding opaque markers into it.The ruler may be comprised of small radiopaque markers, with a knownspatial relationship between them, embedded in a radiolucent envelope.

In a fourth aspect the invention is a method of drawing and displayingon a two dimensional x-ray image measurements of objects visible in saidimage, graphical information, or templates of surgical devices. Themethod comprises the steps of:

-   -   a. identifying the location and orientation of at least one        known object; and    -   b. drawing and displaying the measurements, graphical        information, or templates on the x-ray image on the basis of the        location and the orientation of the known object.

The method is characterized in that the measurements, graphicalinformation, or templates are not a part of the known object. The knownobject can be a ruler according to the third aspect of the invention, asurgical tool, or an anatomical feature.

All the above and other characteristics and advantages of the inventionwill be further understood through the following illustrative andnon-limitative description of preferred embodiments thereof, withreference to the appended drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B illustrate the technical problem that is addressedby the present invention;

FIG. 2 shows a compression hip plate assembly;

FIG. 3 illustrates the tip-apex distance (TAD);

FIGS. 4, 5A and 5B illustrate two embodiments of one dimensional rulersof the invention;

FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a three dimensional ruler of theinvention;

FIG. 7 and FIG. 8 schematically show respectively how one and twodimensional virtual extensions of the ruler of the invention are createdoverlaying the x-ray image of the object of interest;

FIG. 9A to FIG. 9C show a handle comprising a ruler of the invention tobe used by a surgeon to correctly align a drill guide;

FIG. 10A to FIG. 15 illustrate some of the modes of operation of thesystem of the invention;

FIG. 16 symbolically shows how the system of the invention is integratedwith an imaging system; and

FIG. 17 is a flow chart outlining the main stages in processing anddisplaying the images using the system of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The invention is a system that can be used for measuring the truedimensions in a specific orientation of objects in two and threedimensional images. In order to illustrate the invention and inpreferred embodiments thereof, the images considered herein areradiographic images, in particular x-ray images, wherein by x-ray imagesare meant radiographic images, fluoroscopic images, digital fluoroscopyimages, or images taken using any other type that uses x-rays to obtainthem. However it is to be understood that the device and methods of theinvention can be used in any imaging situation. In the case of x-rayradiography, the device and system of the invention are used to measurethe true dimensions and orientation of objects that appear in the imageand to aid the surgeon in the identification and location of surgerytools vs. anatomy in the radiographic image.

FIG. 16 symbolically shows how the system of the invention is integratedwith an imaging system to improve the users understanding of the imagesproduced with the imaging system. The essential components of imagingsystem 200 are the source of radiation 202 and the detector 204. Theimaging system 200 is connected to a computer 206. When an at leastpartially opaque object 210 is placed in the space between the source202 and detector 204 and system 200 is activated, object 202 blocks someof the radiation causing a shadow to appear on the detector. The outputsignals from detector 204 are sent to computer 206 where they areprocessed to produce images that can be stored in the memory of computer206 and/or displayed on display device 208.

The system of the invention comprises two components: a calibrationdevice 70, which is called a “ruler” herein and a computer softwarepackage 216. Radiolucent ruler 70 comprises radiopaque markers 76. It isplaced in the space between source 202 and detector 204 such that atleast some of the markers 76 will be visible in the images gathered byimaging system 200. Computer software package 216 is loaded intocomputer 206 in order to provide the computer with advanced capabilitiesfor processing and displaying the images as a graphical overlay,displayed over the x-ray image on the display 206, thereby providing theuser with information not previously available. Illustrative embodimentsof the ruler and of the software as well as descriptions of the newtypes of visual information that can be provided to the user will bedescribed herein below.

Herein the word “markers” is used to mean features that are visible inthe image, by virtue of their color, luminance or intensity. In the caseof x-ray images, markers have a different radio-opacity than theirimmediate surrounding, or comprise different radio-opacity levels.Markers are regarded as a singular point in space, e.g. the center of aball or a corner of a cubical shape, which is well defined and can benoticed in the image. Herein the words “marker” and “feature” are usedinterchangeably.

In one embodiment, the ruler comprises two or more features having aknown spatial relationship between them that are visible andrecognizable in a radiographic image. For the purpose of the measurementthe two or more features are aligned parallel to the measurementdirection. The associated software allows, amongst many other modes ofoperation to be described herein, the automatic recognition of featuresof the ruler in the radiographic image and the use of these features tocreate a virtual extension of the ruler, i.e. to extend the ruler beyondits physical dimensions, and drawing the virtual extension on the imageas an overlay. The invention enables the surgeon who is pointing theruler and looking at the image to accurately measure dimensions ofobjects that appear in the radiographic image. The invention isespecially useful and convenient for use with x-ray imaging in whichfrequently it is desired to measure the internal organs, bones, etc. ofa body. However, as mentioned above, in principal the invention can beused with any technique of producing two dimensional images, e.g.regular photography.

All prior art methods known to the inventors use the physical scales ona ruler to measure the dimensions of or distances between objects ofinterest either directly or to take a picture and make the measurementsdirectly on that picture in two dimensions. These methods are generallynot accurate for the reasons mentioned hereinabove and do not enableeasily measuring objects in different three dimensional orientations.The approach taken to the problem of making accurate measurements by theinventors is fundamentally different than that of the prior art since itmakes use of control of both the tool, i.e. the ruler, and the display,i.e. the visual image including graphic overlay thereof. The measurementmethod is dependent on the combination of the ruler, which cannot beused to achieve the desired result when used alone and the software,which cannot, be used to make the measurements without the ruler. Onlythrough the combination of ruler and software, as described hereinbelowcan the desired result be obtained.

The invention, in its various embodiments, can be used to assist theoperator in any procedure in which it is desirable or necessary tomeasure distances or dimensions of objects in radiographic images. Suchprocedures range from common chest x-rays, that are analyzed “off-line”,to orthopedic and other surgical procedures that can only be carried out“on-line”, i.e. with the aid of inter-surgery radiographic imageryusing, for example, a mobile C-arm x-ray unit. Typical non-limitativeexamples of on-line procedures that can be performed with the aid of theinvention are:

-   -   Spinal fusion/lumbar spine fixation—insertion of pedicle        vertebral screws;    -   Vertebroplastia—injecting cement to a vertebral body via the        pedicles;    -   Bone biopsy—inserting a long needle through bone, to reach a        tumor or lesion;    -   Dynamic hip screw (DHS) placement procedures for        per-trochanteric and intertrochanteric hip fractures;    -   Three Cannulated Screws placement procedures for sub-capital        fractures;    -   Proximal Femur Nail (PFN) placement procedures for        oblique-reversed and for sub-troch hip fractures; and    -   Trochanteric fixation nail (TFN) fixation.

For purposes of illustrating the invention, its use in relation todynamic hip screw (DHS) placement procedures for hip trauma procedureunder fluoroscopy will now be described. It is emphasized that theinvention is not limited to use in any particular procedure and isexpected to be useful for a wide range of applications. According tostatistics made available by the American Association of OrthopaedicSurgeons, about 450,000 procedures for treatment of hip trauma werecarried out in 2004. Nearly 90% of the procedures were carried out onpersons aged 65 or older who had suffered breaks in the proximal end ofthe femur as a result of a fall. The surgical procedures for treatingthe fractures are well known and documented, including descriptions intextbooks, scientific journals, and even complete protocols that can befound on the internet. Generally speaking, depending on the exact natureof the break, the procedure involves attaching one of a number ofdifferent styles of commercially available compression hip plates to thefemur by means of pins or screws inserted into holes drilled into thebone. A good review of the state of the art can be found in“Intertrochanteric Fractures” by Dr. Kenneth J. Koval and Dr. Robert V.Conto, which is a chapter in the book: Rockwood and Green's Fractures inAdults; Authors: Robert W. Bucholz, M D; James D. Heckman, M D;Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 6th edition, 2005.

A specific protocol for carrying out the surgical procedure can bedownloaded from the web site of Smith & Nephew at[http://www.smithnephew.com/Downloads/71180375.pdf]

FIG. 2 shows a compression hip plate assembly 50 manufactured by Smith &Nephew. The assembly comprises a plate 54 that fits against the outersurface of the femur with an attached barrel 52 that fits into a holebored into the femur. After reduction and fixation of the fracture ahole is bored into the bone through the neck and into the head of thefemur in order to attach lag screw 56. After lag screw 56 has beenscrewed into the head of the femur, the barrel is inserted into thehole, the plate is positioned on the side of the femur, and compressionscrew 60 is screwed in to attach the plate 54 to the lag screw andtightened to bring the broken pieces of bone together. Self tapping bonescrews 58 are used to attach the plate firmly to the shaft of the femurand if necessary, depending on the type of break, cannulated orcancellous screw 62 can be inserted into the bone to capture medialfragments. There are hip plate kits available to the surgeon having manyvariations of the basic design. The variations include, for example, thelength of lag screw 56, the angle between screw 56 and plate 54, and thenumber of cortical screws 58.

The most demanding part of the procedure is creating the hole into whichthe lag screw is inserted. For a successful procedure, the hole mustpass through the bone in a path following the central axis of the neckof the femur towards the apex of the femoral head. The surgeon, assistedby a series of x-ray images taken during the course of the proceeding,uses a small diameter guide drill to make an initial guide hole. Thefirst problem is to determine the neck angle to select an appropriateangle plate, which is used to help determine the proper entry point andto aim the guide drill. The surgeon, referring to the x-ray images,estimates the correct angle and entry point and begins to drill with theguide drill. After drilling a short distance into the bone, he stops andtakes at least two x-rays at right angles to each other to ascertainthat he is indeed drilling in the correct direction and along the centerof the neck. In order to do this he must mentally project the image ofthe drill forward through the anatomical features, a task that iscomplicated, especially given the required precision and the challengingimage quality. In addition, a typical C-arm equipped with an imageintensifier tube for generating the images creates a distortion to theimage usually causing straight lines to appear curved in the images: Itis noted that if the surgeon has only to extend the line from the drilltheoretically he is not influenced by the scale and a line in threedimensional world will still appear to be a line in the two dimensionalprojection image; however this theoretical extension is not an easytask, especially when precision is so important. If the drill pathappears to be correct, then the surgeon drills a bit further beforestopping to check again by repeated x ray imaging. If, at any stage, thepath appears to be incorrect, then the surgeon must withdraw the guidedrill and begin drilling again using a different angle and/or entrypoint. Another difficulty is ascertaining exactly where to stopdrilling. It is essential that the lag screw be attached to as much ofthe bone as possible; however sufficient bone must remain at the apex ofthe head to prevent the lag screw from breaking through into the hipjoint when the screw is inserted in the hole. This issue involves notonly measurement of drilling orientation but also of drilling depth.

A typical procedure of this type carried out by an experienced surgeontakes a considerable amount of time, most of which is consumed by trialand error attempts to obtain the proper alignment. Additionally between100-150 x-ray images are typically required, which, despite allprecautions, represents a serious health hazard for both the patientand, to a greater extent, for the operating room staff that can bepresent for several similar operations each day.

The reason that so much time and care is taken to insure properalignment of the guide hole is that failure of fixation ofintertrochanteric fractures that have been treated with a fixed-anglesliding hip-screw device is frequently related to incorrect position ofthe lag screw in the femoral head. To insure success of the procedureand prevent mechanical failure, i.e. bone cut-out, an accuracy of ±2-3mm of screw location is crucial. A simple measurement called thetip-apex distance (TAD) is used to describe the position of the screw.This measurement is illustrated in FIG. 3. The dashed lines representthe desired direction of the lateral axis of the lag screw in theradiographic images. X_(ap) and D_(ap) mark the distances from the tipof the lag screw to the apex of the femoral head and the measureddiameter of the lag screw measured on an anteroposterior (AP)radiograph, respectively. X_(lat) and D_(lat) mark the same parametersmeasured on a lateral radiograph, and D_(true) is the actual diameter ofthe lag screw. Then the TAD is given by the formula:

TAD=(X _(ap) ×D _(true) /D _(ap))+(X _(lat) ×D _(true) /D _(lat))

The results of many studies show that the failure rate approaches zeroif the TAD is less than 25 mm and the chances of failure increaserapidly as the TAD increases above 25 mm [M R Baumgaertner, S L Curtin,D M Lindskog and J M Keggi, “The value of the tip-apex distance inpredicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of thehip”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 7, 1058-1064,1995]. Using present techniques, the DHS can only be determined afterthe procedure has been completed. Using the present invention thesurgeon will be able to estimate the DHS at the preplanning stage beforebeginning to drill the guide hole and will be able to know the expectedvalue at any stage of the procedure.

FIGS. 4, 5A, and 5B illustrate two embodiments of a one-dimensionalruler of the invention. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, ruler 70 iscomprised of a cylinder 72 of radiolucent material. A slot 74 is createdlengthwise in cylinder 72 so that the ruler can be slipped over thesurgical tool, e.g. a guide, i.e. a thin bone drill sometimes known as aguide wire, without the necessity of releasing the guide from the powerdrill. The dimensions of the slot are such that the longitudinal axis ofthe guide and cylinder 72 coincide when ruler 70 is attached to theguide. The guide fits tightly in the slot so that the ruler will notslide freely but can be shifted easily by the surgeon to a new positionwhen desired. Some embodiments of the ruler will rotate with the guideand other embodiments of the ruler can be attached so that the guide mayrotate without rotating the attached ruler. Metal balls 76 are embeddedinto cylinder 72 in rows that are parallel to the direction of slot 74.Metal balls “floating” in a plastic cylinder are preferably used so thatthe x-ray signature of the ruler will be dark circles that are easilydetectable in the image. One row of balls 76 is theoreticallysufficient; however it is preferred that at least three rows of balls76, equally radially spaced around the circumference of the base ofcylinder 72, be used to insure that at any position of the ruler on theguide at least one row of balls will not be overlaid by the radiopaqueguide or another row of balls, and will be visible on the x-ray image.

The exact distance between balls 76 is known so that when their shadowsare detected on the x-ray image the dedicated software of the inventioncan identify them and measure the apparent distance between themdirectly from the image and use this measurement together with the knownactual distance to calculate the scale that is used to create theoverlays that allow the surgeon to determine the exact position of theguide relative to the anatomical structure, dimensions, and otherrelated information displayed on a screen in “real time”. As a minimum,only two balls 76 in one row are needed to be visible in the image inorder to create an acceptable approximation of the C-arm magnificationfactor and the sizes of organs and tools for most common cases. However,since increased accuracy is obtainable by using the averages of severalapparent measurements and also since some balls may be hard to see inthe image it is preferred to use a minimum of three or four balls ineach row to get a more accurate mathematical extension of the ruler.Also, if the angle between the ruler and the image plane is large, thescale change along the ruler extension, in the image, is not negligible.It is therefore preferred to use more than one measurement, at differentheights, so that an approximation of this effect can be calculated.

Another way of explaining the problem of crating an accurate scale forthe images and the solution to the problem is the following: It is knownthat the magnification increases linearly with the distance from thex-ray source. Therefore, if there are only two markers, the distancebetween them can be measured, however, it is impossible to determine ifthis distance is accurate because the ruler may not lie in a planeparallel to the image. Therefore, the measured distance between markerscan not be counted on to provide an accurate scale for creating virtualextensions, overlays and other advanced features provided by the presentinvention. To overcome this problem a ruler with several markers, havinga known distance between them, is used. If the ruler is parallel to theimage plane, then the scale is correct and a true 2D calibration isobtained. If, however, the ruler is not parallel to the image plane, thedistance between markers, i.e. the scale, will grow smaller to onedirection and larger in the other direction, changing with the distancefrom the x-ray source. In this case, if there are three markers or more,not only the distance between markers but also the rate of change of thedistance can be measured and therefore an accurate scale in bothdirections can be calculated.

FIG. 5A shows another embodiment of a ruler 70′ of the invention. Inthis embodiment the radiolucent body 80 of the ruler is roughly a prismhaving an isosceles triangle as its base. The sides of the prism are cutaway to leave a Y-shaped cross section. A row of metal balls 76 (seen inFIG. 5B, which is a cross-sectional view of ruler 70′) is embedded atthe apex of each of the arms of the “Y”. A slot 74 is created along thelongitudinal symmetry axis of body 80 of ruler 70′. Body 80 is slippedover guide 78 and then a clip 82 is attached to body 80 to hold guide 78in slot 74. This can be done with the guide attached to the drill. Inthis embodiment the width of slot 74 need not necessarily be essentiallyequal to the diameter of the guide but it can be wide enough to allowthe ruler to be attached to guides having a wide range of diameters.Clip 82 comprises a spring loaded brake (not shown) that locks ruler 70′in place, preventing it from sliding along guide 78. Pressing downwardon clip 82 in the direction of arrow 84 releases the brake allowingruler 70′ to be moved and repositioned along the guide. Repositioningcan be easily accomplished by the surgeon using one hand, at any timeduring the procedure.

FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a three dimensional ruler 70″ of theinvention. In this embodiment the radiolucent body 86 of the ruler hasan “L” shaped cross section. Rows of radiopaque balls 76 are embedded inthe walls of body 86. A suitable arrangement, e.g. a slit and/or a clipsuch as described above, are provided to slidingly hold ruler 70″ inplace on guide 78.

Many different arrangements of markers are described herein with regardto specific illustrative examples of the ruler. In principal the minimalrequirement of the invention for the number and arrangement of markersis one of the following:

-   -   Two markers aligned in the direction of the measurement—This        will enable determining a scale with not very good accuracy        because of the other degree of freedom described herein above.    -   Three markers aligned in the direction of measurement—This will        enable higher accuracy.    -   A set of at least three markers, not on the same line, is        sufficient in order to create an accurate three dimensional        orientation and thereby enable measurement of an object in every        orientation.    -   In all cases, the markers do not have to be equally spaced but        must be in a known spatial arrangement.    -   In the figures herein several rows of equally spaced markers        have been included so that they will not occlude each other and        therefore allow a better chance of detecting them. There is,        however, no minimal requirement of the number of rows of markers        that must be used.

In another embodiment, the triangular sleeve with handle that is used byorthopedic surgeons to aid them in maintaining the alignment of thedrill in a DHS placement procedure, as known to persons skilled in theart, can be modified by embedding a three dimensional ruler of theinvention inside it, in which case, the modified sleeve itself can beused to fulfill the functions of the ruler of the invention that aredescribed herein. The sleeve is made of radiolucent material andcomprises a set of metal balls, arranged in a known spatial arrangement,such that the 3D orientation of the ruler may be calculated using theballs that appear in the image.

FIG. 9A to FIG. 9C respectively show front and back perspective viewsand a cross-sectional view of a handle 90 comprising a ruler of theinvention that can replace the traditional triangular sleeve used bysurgeons to aid in aligning a guide drill. As seen in the Figures,handle 90 has a “T” shape with a crosspiece 92 at the top of shaft 93that allows the user to easily and firmly grip handle 90 with one hand.At the bottom of shaft 93 is a foot 94. The bottom surface of foot 94comprises means, e.g. cleats 96, to prevent the device from sliding onthe surface of the skin. In FIG. 9B the exit hole 98 of slot 74 (FIG.9C) through which the guide drill passes can be seen on the bottom offoot 94. At least the foot 94 and the lower portion of shaft 93 (throughwhich slot 74 passes) of handle 90 are made of a radiolucent material.In the illustrative example shown, embedded in this material are tworows comprised of five of radiopaque markers 76 each, a horizontal rowembedded in the foot 94 and a vertical row embedded in the lower part ofshaft 93. Notice that the markers in each row are not equally spaced andthat neither of the rows of markers is aligned in parallel to thedirection of the drilling. However, the software of the system canidentify the markers 76 and from them determine the location andorientation of the handle 90, from this the exact orientation of slot74, and can create a virtual extension of the guide that is insertedinto slot 74, in the direction of drilling, beyond its physicaldimension. Using this handle, a ruler need not be attached to the drilland the system of the invention will recognize the handle and canextrapolate it in both directions and can also display the implanttemplate, i.e., a graphic overlay of where the implant would be,including all its parts, at the current position of the triangle (see,for example, FIG. 14 and FIG. 15). This approach allows an“intra-operative real time” visualization and measurement ability usingthe tools that are familiar to the surgeon.

In accordance with the discussion herein above, preferred embodiments ofthree dimensional rulers can be constructed comprising two sets ofnon-parallel rows of markers in order to provide a device for which themarkers will be identified even when the ruler is partially occluded byother objects, e.g. bones or tools in the image. Using such a ruler, athree dimensional grid can be projected onto the image.

As discussed hereinabove, embodiments of the ruler of the inventioncomprise an elongated radiolucent body in which rows of radiopaquemarkers of known size and distance apart are symmetrically embedded. Inits different embodiments, the ruler of the invention can be: ahand-held ruler used to “point: and “measure”; the ruler can comprisemeans for slideably attaching it to a surgical tool, e.g. handle 90shown in FIGS. 9A to 9C; or the ruler can be an integral part of asurgical tool, possibly made by making at least part of the tool from atranslucent material and embedding radiopaque markers into it. The rulercan be a one dimensional ruler in which the rows of radiopaque markersare parallel to the measuring direction or a three dimensional ruler inwhich a non parallel rows of markers are embedded. In some embodimentsthe ruler could comprise a metal comb or a metal jig, with notranslucent material. The radiopaque markers would then be eithercharacteristic features of the ruler, e.g. the teeth of the comb, orcould be, e.g. metal balls attached to the body of the ruler.

Generally, when the ruler is attached to a surgical tool as will bedemonstrated by example hereinbelow, during a medical procedure theruler stays in a fixed position, e.g. at a location on the surface ofthe body or an organ within the body of a patient, while the tool isadvanced into or withdrawn from the body or organ during the course of adiagnostic or surgical procedure.

In some preferred embodiments the ruler is made of bio-compatible USPclass 6 materials and is reusable after sterilization using, forexample, ETO. In a preferred embodiment, the entire ruler, except forthe metal balls, is made of plastic. Under x-ray the ruler is seen assemi transparent and the metal balls are seen “floating” around theguide/drill. Based on these fundamentals and the examples of theembodiments described herein, skilled persons should have no troubledesigning a ruler suitable for use with any diagnostic or surgical tool.

FIG. 7 and FIG. 8 schematically show respectively how one and twodimensional virtual extensions of the ruler of the invention are createdoverlaying the x-ray image of the object of interest. In FIG. 7, object20 and radiopaque balls 76 embedded in a ruler of the invention, that isattached to guide drill 78, are shown positioned in the path of a beamof x-rays emitted by source 10. The dashed lines represent the shadowsof the radiopaque objects that form images 40 on the electronic camera.The digital signals from the camera are processed using the softwarepackage of the invention to determine the distance between the images ofthe balls of the ruler. From the measured and known distances a scalefactor is determined and a virtual extension 88 of the ruler isconstructed. The virtual extension can be added as an overlay on thedisplayed x-ray image in a number of ways that can be selected by theoperator. In the case of the orthopedic procedures described herein, thesuggested display mode is to place the graphic presentation of thevirtual extension exactly on top of the longitudinal axis of the guidedrill with the origin at the distal tip of the drill, as seen in the xray image. This is shown in FIG. 7 on the image plane representing thedisplayed image in the actual system. In this way, the surgeon can,using both forward distance scales and rearward distance scales,determine respectively how much farther the drill must be advanced andhow far into the object the drill has penetrated.

Other display features are possible, e.g. color coding to easilydistinguish between forward and rearward distances, the addition oftransverse scales at locations selected by the operator to enablemeasurement of the distance from the center of the drill to the sides ofthe object for example to confirm that the hole is being drilled exactlythrough the center of the object, and the addition of color codedmarkings to indicate when the drill is approaching and/or has arrived atthe location that drilling should cease.

FIG. 8 is similar to FIG. 7 with the exception that use of the threedimensional ruler provides sufficient information for the software toconstruct a two dimensional grid that can be displayed on the screen asan overlay on top of the x-ray image. In fact, since the threedimensional ruler can provide a complete three dimensional orientation,the grid could be drawn in any orientation, and not just the originalorientation of the ruler (as shown in the Figure).

The system of the invention is used with a C-arm X-ray unit or someother imaging system. It comprises a ruler, and software that enablesdisplay of the virtual extension and allows display of the overlays andother features described herein, e.g. the software may include computervision and recognition algorithms that are used to identify implants,surgical tools and anatomical features and to draw their counterparts orextensions during the operation as an overlay on the x-ray image (seeFIG. 11). In some embodiments, the software works in semi-automatic modewherein it allows the user to mark on the balls on the computer screen,e.g. by pointing to and clicking on them using a computer mouse, andthen calculates the scale and draws the virtual extension. In otherembodiments it is not necessary to mark all or some of the balls in animage or to mark the balls in successive images. The process may bestarted with a user click and then the software automatically searchesfor the markers and for the guide in the next image.

Skilled persons will recognize that the system can be given the abilityto display the images in many different formats to assist the surgeon,e.g. different colors can be used to differentiate how far the drill haspenetrated into the bone from the remaining distance. In addition, othertypes of information, can be provided by audible signal, e.g. signifyingthe remaining distance or when to stop drilling.

In addition, for imaging systems equipped with an image intensifier,some embodiments provide an anti-distortion system for extra accuracy.The anti-distortion system is a conventional one, as known to personsskilled in the art, comprises a grid placed on the image intensifier(the receiving end of the C-arm) and software that uses the image of thegrid to correct the image obtained from the C-arm. Anti-distortionsystems suitable for use with the present invention are described in:[Gronenschild E., “Correction for geometric image distortion in thex-ray imaging chain: local technique versus global technique” Med Phys.1999, December; 26(12):2602-16]. In cases in which an anti-distortionsystem is used, the detection of the ruler markers using the software ofthe present invention has to be done on the image after theanti-distortion process.

FIG. 17 is a flow chart outlining the main stages in processing anddisplaying the images using the system of the invention. In the firststage, 501, the x-ray image obtained using the imaging system 200 (seeFIG. 16) undergoes an image distortion process. This phase is notmandatory, and depends on the imaging system. Some imaging systems donot create significant distortions and for these systems this phase canbe skipped. Image distortion correction is done in any one of thestandard ways, known in the art.

The next stage 502 is marker identification in the image. The marker,identification can be done either manually, where the user points at thelocation of the markers using a pointing device, such as a computermouse; can be done in a semi-automatic manner, where some user input isrequired and some of the marker identification is done automatically; orcan be done in a fully automatic manner, where an image processingalgorithm, provided in the software of the system, is used to detect themarkers in the image.

In the next stage 503, the software of the system calculates the scale,using the markers in the image identified in stage 502. If a onedimensional ruler has been used, then the markers are co-linear and theonly scale that can be deduced is in the direction of the markers. Sincethe magnification of an object depends on its distance from the x-raysource, if only two markers are used, the exact position and orientationof the ruler cannot be determined, since a rotation of the ruler mayhave the same effect, as a change of distance from the x-ray source, onthe distance between the markers on the image (see FIGS. 1A and 1B).Since the orientation of the object is not determined, rulerextrapolation cannot be achieved with high accuracy because, if themeasurement direction is at an acute angle to the x-rays, scalingchanges rapidly along the direction of measurement. In order to be ableto extrapolate the ruler accurately, it is necessary to have at leastthree markers on the line, in which case the scale as well as theorientation of the measurement direction can be calculated with respectto the x-ray image, since the scale linearly increases with the distancefrom the x-ray source. If the user is willing to ignore thismagnification problem, a less accurate approximation may be obtainedusing only two markers.

When using a three dimensional ruler objects can be measured at anyorientation. The minimal requirement in the three dimensional case is atleast 3 markers that are not co-linear.

In the next step 504 the system draws an overlay over the x-ray image.The overlay may include any type of graphical or other information,drawn or printed over the image. Amongst other things, it may include avirtual extension of a drill, an implant image, taken from a pre-storedlibrary of implants, or a virtual drawing of a measurement ruler,aligned with the device. The overlay can make use of the location andorientation of the device in the image. Preferred embodiments mayinclude a GUI that enables the user to easily select and customize theoverlay shown over the images.

The use of the invention and its advantages will now be demonstratedwith reference a dynamic hip screw (DHS) placement procedure. The entireprocedure is carried out in the operating room with the aid of a C-armx-ray system. After completing the fracture reduction the surgeon beginsthe pre-operative planning. This stage is carried out beforesterilization and cutting the skin to expose the bone. The commonpractice is to take one image from approximately an anterior/posterior(AP) angle, and do the entire operation planning on a single image whileignoring the three dimensional aspects of the bone. Since embodiments ofthe invention can be used to identify the surgeon's tools and draw theirvirtual extension, e.g. the track that a drill will follow, suchembodiments can be used during the planning stage. The surgeon canattach a ruler, e.g. ruler 70 (FIG. 4) to the distal end of the guidedrill or slide the guide drill into the slot of a handle, e.g. handle 90(FIG. 9A), place the distal end of the guide drill against the outsidesurface of the skin, and point the guide in the direction he wishes todrill. The software of the system will then draw the virtual extensionof the ruler and overlay it on the x-ray image thereby helping thesurgeon to optimize the determination of penetration point and drillingangle and measure how deep he should drill. In some embodiments thesoftware package of the invention enables the surgeon to apply templatesof the tools and lag screws of different dimensions and to determineaccurate measurements of the anatomical features to plan exactly theoperation, including screw selection, and to visualize the end result.FIG. 15 shows this feature of the operation planning stage.

FIG. 12 shows the display during operation, after the skin was alreadycut and some of the surgical tools were inserted to the body. The drill78 is about to enter the femur and the surgeon uses a triangular sleeveto enter at the correct angle (135 degrees). On top of this image a twodimensional grid has been drawn to illustrate how the ruler of theinvention and its virtual extension 104 would appear.

FIG. 13 shows the situation after drilling with the guide drill 78. Thevirtual ruler 104 displayed on the screen overlaying the guide and thebone allows the surgeon to see exactly how far the drill has penetratedthe bone and to confirm that the path is correct. In order to achievemaximum accuracy a three dimensional ruler is used to determine theplane on which to draw the line perpendicular to the drilling direction,i.e. to correct for the change of scale of the ruler on the drill causedby the fact that the drill is tilted at an angle relative to the planeof the image. In most cases a one dimensional ruler could be just asuseful; but in either case, the surgeon can see how far the guide tip isfrom the hip joint. This is useful for determining the expected distancefrom the joint. Note that this is not exactly the tip apex distance, butrather a more accurate 3D measurement, that is similar in concept to theTAD.

After the screw has been installed in the bone, the virtual ruler allowsthe surgeon to accurately measure the tip-apex distance and verify thatthe surgery has been performed properly.

As is apparent from the description hereinabove, embodiments of theinvention are very versatile when applied to orthopedic surgery and thesoftware package may have the capability of allowing the operator tochoose from many different operating modes, depending on therequirements or stage of the procedure. A list of some prominent modesof operation, some of which are shown schematically in FIG. 10A to FIG.15, will now be presented:

1. Virtual extension of a tool or object in an image—This mode ofoperation can be carried out by the system of the invention using animage recognition program included in the software package without theuse of the ruler or any other sensors. FIG. 10A is a drawing showing theguide drill 78 brought close to the femur 100. FIG. 10B shows guide 78in contact with femur 100. The software of the system of the invention,at a command from the operator, recognizes the guide in the x-ray imageand draws its virtual extension (thin line 102) through the bone. Thisallows the surgeon to easily see the path that the drill will followthrough the bone and correct it, if necessary, before starting to drill.

2. Virtual extension of the ruler—The pointing aspect of the ruler ofthe invention is essentially different from image calibration or normalrulers. The system extends the ruler so that the operator only needs tolook at the image, which also shows the ruler, and to point the ruler inthe direction he wants to measure in order to get the measurement. Thezero scale on the ruler of the virtual extension can be dragged andmoved around on the image at will, thereby making it easy for theoperator to make any measurement that he feels is necessary. Note thatin prior art calibration techniques the points the operator wishes tomeasure must be marked on the image and the calibration device moved tomeasure between the points.

The pointing aspect is especially important in measuring objects in livevideo since in this case the operator can't take the time to mark thepoints of interest. An example of such a measurement is to measure thesize of the heart under x-ray while injecting a contrast liquid to theblood.

FIG. 11 shows how a surgeon would use the virtual extension 104 of a onedimensional ruler 76, mounted on a guide 78, to measure how deep hewants to drill. FIG. 12 shows how a surgeon would use the virtualextension of a three dimensional ruler 76, mounted on a guide 78, tomeasure the distance from the insertion point of the drill, in thedirection of drilling.

3. Using one or three-dimensional rulers to project accurate grids onthe image. FIG. 13 shows how a surgeon would use the virtual extension104 of a three dimensional ruler 76, mounted on a guide 78, to measurethe distance from the hip joint, both in the direction of drilling, andin the direction perpendicular to it. This is not exactly the tip-apexdistance, but a more accurate 3D measurement that was not possible inthe prior art, and is similar to the TAD.

4. Projecting approximate grids on the image. For example, working witha one dimensional ruler the software simply assumes that the other axeshave a similar scale.

5. Real time visualization—This has two aspects: Use either a one or athree dimensional ruler in order to draw how the result of the operation(or part of it) will look given the positioning of the ruler or someother surgical tool. For example, if it is decided to drill in aparticular direction, the system of the invention can show how the DHSwill be positioned. The other aspect, based on mode 1, is to simply usean approximate dimensional scale based on the known or approximatedimensions of the objects seen in the image to create the grids. Thismay be inaccurate and spatially wrong, but can sometimes be good enough.For example, it is enough to see a guide drill in the image to know theapproximate scale of the image and draw the DHS screw or the entire DHSimplant around it.

Real time visualization takes place after the planning stage, during theactual procedure itself. FIG. 14 illustrates this mode of operation.After fracture reduction the surgeon cuts the skin and brings the tip ofthe guide drill 78 into contact with the bone. He then takes an x-rayimage and asks the system of the invention to draw a virtual extension102 of the guide on the image. As a result of the pre-operation planningstep (described herein below) he knows which DHS assembly to use. He nowrequests that the system of the invention retrieve the template 106 ofthe selected DHS assembly and draw it around the extension 102 of theguide 78. Note that in FIG. 14, the guide has been deliberately placedin a wrong direction of drilling and a wrong entry point in order todemonstrate how drawing the template on the guide can be helpful for thesurgeon, i.e. having the template drawn on the image makes it very easyfor the surgeon to see that he/she is/or is not drilling in the rightplace/direction.

6. Pre-operative planning—FIG. 15 illustrates this mode of operation.This mode is carried out on an image taken after the fracture reduction,using a calibration and a template library. Here the surgeon choosesdifferent templates and has them drawn, i.e. overlaid, on the image ofthe bone to determine exactly which DHS assembly has the properparameters to use with the specific bone and how to place it. Note thatthis is very different from the instant visualization, althoughsometimes the images look similar. Also, although operation planning isnot new, the inventors are not aware of any other computerized systemthat enables the planning to be done inside the operating room. Intrauma cases, the planning has to be done in the operating room sinceonly after fracture reduction can the operation be planned.

7. Image enhancement—The processing means of the system automaticallydetermines the location of the guide in the image, therefore an imageenhancement algorithm can be applied that automatically concentrates onthe specific area of interest to the surgeon.

8. Synchronizing AP/axial images—This is one of the most demanding tasksfacing surgeons performing surgical procedures under guidance of a c-armsystem. Consider a dynamic hip screw (DHS) placement procedure andsuppose that the surgeon, using the system of the invention, first takesan image I from an axial angle, with a ruler on a guide. Then, withoutmoving the guide, he takes another image J from AP angle. If afterwardshe drills a bit more and then takes a third image K, also from an APangle, then the system can calculate how deep the drill got in image I.This is only possible since the ruler is visible on all the images I, J,and K and is done by measuring the true distance of drilling between Jand K, and virtually extending the drill by that distance in image I.

This is a very important feature that can save the surgeon thedifficulty of going back to the axial angle and taking another image.This means less radiation and less operating time, and instant feedback.

It is to be noted that in certain applications the known shape anddimensions of surgical tools or even anatomical features that arevisible in the x-ray image can be used in place of a ruler. In thesecases the methods described above can be used to produce the same visualeffects described hereinabove; e.g. virtual extension of the tool orplacement of a template on a bone.

Although embodiments of the invention have been described by way ofillustration, it will be understood that the invention may be carriedout with many variations, modifications, and adaptations, withoutexceeding the scope of the claims.

1. A system for imaging based surgical support in orthopedic implantprocedures, said system comprising: an invasive surgical tool includinga set of features identifiable in a two dimensional (2D) medical imageand having known spatial relationships between them; receiving circuitryadapted to receive a given 2D medical image of the surgical tool incontact with, or within, an organ of a subject of a given orthopedicimplant procedure; an image processor adapted to derive, from theappearances of said features in the 2D medical image, a spatialrelationship between said invasive surgical tool and the organ anddetermine, based on the derived spatial relationship, an expectedcollocation of an orthopedic implant in relation to the organ; andrendering circuitry adapted to render the expected collocation upon anassociated display.
 2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the 2Dmedical image is an x-ray.
 3. The system according to claim 1, wherein:said receiving circuitry is further adapted to receive a series of 2Dmedical images of the surgical tool in contact with, or within, theorgan of the subject of the given orthopedic implant procedure; saidimage processor is further adapted to derive from each given image ofthe series, from the appearances of said features in the given image, agiven spatial relationship between said invasive surgical tool and theorgan and determine for each given image of the series, based on thederived given spatial relationship, a given expected collocation of theorthopedic implant in relation to the organ; and said renderingcircuitry is further adapted to render the given expected collocationsin sequence in real time.
 4. The system according to claim 1, whereinthe image processing circuitry is further adapted to identify a contourof the organ in the given 2D medical image.
 5. The system according toclaim 1, wherein said image processor is further adapted to derive, fromthe appearances of said features in the 2D medical image, measurementsof dimensions within the image and render the measurements on the imageon the associated display.
 6. A system for imaging based surgicalsupport in orthopedic implant procedures, said system comprising: a twodimensional (2D) medical imaging device adapted to capture an image of asubject of a given orthopedic implant procedure, during the implantprocedure; an image processor adapted: (i) identify, in real time,features of an invasive surgical tool in contact with, or within, anorgan of a subject of the implant procedure; (ii) derive, from spatialrelationships between the identified features, a spatial relationshipbetween said invasive surgical tool and the organ; and (iii) determine,in real time, based on the derived spatial relationships, an expectedcollocation of an orthopedic implant in relation to the organ; andrendering circuitry adapted to render, in real time, the expectedcollocation upon an associated display.
 7. The system according to claim6, wherein the 2D medical imaging device is an x-ray device.
 8. Thesystem according to claim 6, wherein: said 2D imaging device is furtheradapted to capture a series of 2D medical images of the subject, duringthe implant procedure; said image processor is further adapted to derivefrom each given image of the series, from the appearances of saidfeatures in the given image, a given spatial relationship between saidinvasive surgical tool and the organ and determine for each given imageof the series, based on the derived given spatial relationship, a givenexpected collocation of the orthopedic implant in relation to the organ;and said rendering circuitry is further adapted to render the givenexpected collocations in sequence in real time.
 9. The system accordingto claim 6, wherein the image processing circuitry is further adapted toidentify a contour of the organ in the given 2D medical image.
 10. Amethod for imaging based surgical support in orthopedic implantprocedures, said method comprising: capturing a two dimensional a 2Dimage of a subject of a given orthopedic implant procedure, during theimplant procedure, using a (2D) medical imaging device; using an imageprocessor to identify, in real time, features of an invasive surgicaltool in contact with, or within, an organ of the subject; using theimage processor to derive, from spatial relationships between theidentified features, a spatial relationship between said invasivesurgical tool and the organ; using the image processor to determine, inreal time, based on the derived spatial relationships, an expectedcollocation of an orthopedic implant in relation to the organ; andrendering upon an associated display the expected collocation, in realtime.
 11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the medical imagingdevice is an x-ray device.
 12. The method according to claim 10, furthercomprising: capturing a series of 2D medical images of the subject,during the implant procedure; using the image processor to derive fromeach given image of the series, from the appearances of said features inthe given image, a given spatial relationship between said invasivesurgical tool and the organ; determining for each given image of theseries, based on the derived given spatial relationship, a givenexpected collocation of the orthopedic implant in relation to the organ;and rendering upon the associated display the given expectedcollocations in sequence in real time.
 13. The method according to claim10, further comprising using the image processor to identify a contourof the organ in the 2D medical image.